Thursday, April 1, 2010

That Old shakedown

You'd think they'd have learned by now.

Last night's meeting at the high school drew a capacity crowd of citizens angered by the Education plan to lay off 54 teachers and close Molloy and Thompson schools.  This little gem of a plan was hatched  by our very own $155,000.00-a-year genius, Superintendent Neil Cavallaro:

Leaving aside all the emotional considerations (for the moment), there's some hard facts that have to be faced.  First of all, it's no secret that school boards around the state and all over the country are facing declining student enrollment, declining tax revenues, and skyrocketing costs.  So it cannot be argued that West Haven's schools are facing a real crisis.

Having said that, it's also true that the steps proposed by Cavallaro to address this problem should properly be the last option: before we start cannibalizing our assets, we should first attack our costs.  

We should look at the bloated administration staff at Ogden Street: a mare's nest of petty patronage jobs and over-compensated individuals.

We should look at finding savings in non-essential programs:  perhaps requiring athletic teams to pay for equipment and the upkeep of the physical plant (such as Ken Strong Stadium, Bennett Rink, and so on).

We should be able to open discussions with the various unions to investigate possible savings in health and pension costs (that is, we should if our administrators were acting in good faith; and it's clear that they're doing everything possible to avoid that.)

We should also look at the costs of closing these schools and the loss of these teachers.  West Haven received millions in grant money to upgrade these schools...money that will have to be repaid if these schools are closed.  We will lose the inestimable future value of these young, dedicated teachers of our children.  And how much fuel and time will be wasted carting kids willy-nilly all over the City?  And how much additional costs will be incurred helping these kids to become acclimated to a new school,  new friends, and new teachers?

The administration seems to think of our schools like a warehouse:  it's one thing to ship a bunch of boxes from one location to another.  But our children are living, thinking, and vulnerable human beings: the intangible cost of this proposed upheaval has to be considered.

It is obvious that this dog of a plan is likely to end up costing the taxpayer - in real dollars and indirectly -  for many years to come.  And so, the plan should be shelved, and the administration be directed to explore other means of saving the money necessary to continue their vital mandate of properly educating our most precious asset: our children and our future. 

Sadly, though, it's also obvious that this ill-advised route has been chosen.  The powers-that-be will give vent to the righteous anger of the people, nod sagely and make comforting statements about how they understand and feel this pain...and then will do whatever they damned well please. 

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

OMG!!! my sentiments exactly, perhaps our dictator should really look into Plan C! ok, Plan c entails moving 5th graders into their perspective middle schools one year earlier. Now, we don't even want 5th grade to be removed from elementary school, but with the closing of two schools, to be able to absorb those displaced children, 5th grade has
to be moved. But not neccessarily to Carrigan for 5/6, nor 7/8 to Bailey. There are the same exact number of students in each school no matter how you deal it! approx. 1,000 in Bailey and 1,000 in Carrigan, whether you put 5,6,7,8 or 5/6 and 7/8 seperately. And there isn't any cost savings to shuffling children all over the city. Just higher test scores when you combine all 5th grade you will get the median. Another point 5th grade teachers do not have to leave their schools, meaning that 5th grade teachers will not be teaching our 5th graders! Fact! Neil thinks Carrigan will become a model school for connecticut! What is he smoking now!!!! 6th grade is already sheilded from 7/8th, and 5th is self contained, so 5th isn't mixing with 7/8th graders. Same number of students same number of mouths to feed and children to educate!! show us cost savings and prove this will not be a traumatic change for our children!

West Haven Bob said...

I remember back to 1970, when I was transferred from Washington School to Giannotti Middle School. I still know how much a transition that was. I was going from an insular system (one class all day, comprised of kids from my neighborhood) to a semi-universal system (multiple classes, with kids outside my experience.)

I didn't handle it well...I wonder how kids will deal with this proposed change; and I wonder what will be the "collateral damage": in lost lives, and injuries to innocents.

All in the name of economy. All because our government won't cut the fat first.